LEED CoreConcepts&Strategies_3rd edition - Page 035

Extracted Content

construction, operations and maintenance, refurbishment, and renovation. A building’s life-cycle ends in demolition or, preferably, reuse.

In most cases in our industrial system, we treat the manufacture of products, the construction of buildings, and the operations of organizations as open systems. We take materials from outside the system, use them to make something, and then discard what remains. This throughput of resources occurs at every phase of the life-cycle, creating a constant cycle of consumption and waste. In addition to the upstream effects that happen before a material is used, there are downstream impacts associated with its operation and end of life. We need to consider both upstream and downstream effects in our decision-making processes.

Systems thinking relies on identifying and acting on opportunities to close this loop. Because we typically do not consider building elements as linked into a larger set of systems, this waste remains largely invisible. By incorporating the upstream effects into our analysis of alternatives, we can get a broader picture of the environmental costs and benefits of materials. The practice of investigating materials from the point of extraction to their disposal is sometimes described as cradle to grave—a term that suggests a linear process through an open system. To emphasize the cyclical aspect of a closed system, architect William McDonough and colleague Michael Braungart coined the phrase cradle to cradle. In a closed system, there is no waste, and all things find another purpose at the end of their useful lives.

A comprehensive, life-cycle approach improves the ability to address potentially important environmental and human health concerns. For example, a product may consist of material mined in Africa, manufactured in Asia, and shipped to the United States for purchase. By focusing only on the energy efficiency of this product during its use, we might miss the damage caused by its transport from the place of manufacture or by the extraction of its raw material. Or a window may have a high recycled content but not be highly efficient. By looking only at the percentage of recycled content, we might select a product that will compromise the project’s energy-saving goals. In a green building project, the team must consider embodied energy—the total amount of energy used to harvest or extract, manufacture, transport, install, and use a product across its life-cycle—alongside performance and adaptability. The careful consideration of all attributes may lead to the selection of products that did not at first appear to be the most sustainable option.

Life-cycle thinking can be applied to environmental considerations, in which case it is called life-cycle assessment (LCA), and to cost considerations, or lifecycle costing (LCC). These are distinct approaches with different methodologies but are often confused. Both can support more sustainable decision making, but they use different types of data and provide different kinds of information.

Life-cycle assessment attempts to identify and quantify environmental effects throughout the life of materials, products, or buildings. It identifies all

Paper recycled

by consumer

Transported to a local mill

Renewable energy used in

milling and pulp process

100% post-consumer

Books distributed

locally

Sustainable

forestry practice

New books printed using

waste

Paper transported

on hybrid trucks

to local printer

Figure 2.5. Considering a Product’s Entire Life-cycle

28